<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Compensation &#8211; A Landmark Judgement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/</link>
	<description>The Events in Human Resources and Employee Relations space, and in My World through my eyes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dr. R. Krishna Murthy		</title>
		<link>https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. R. Krishna Murthy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the amendment to the Workmen&#039;s Compensation Bill, including the wording of the Act and changing the name to Employees Compensation Bill provides for a removal of the ceiling. I saw the Bill, but am yet to see the notification of the Act. The changes do provide for a removal of the ceiling of Rs.4000 which pegged the limit of compensation paid particularly for those drawing more salary. Moreover, in the Act, clerical employees were also not covered. The Amendment provided for the larger coverage.&lt;br /&gt;Dr. R. Krishna Murthy&lt;br /&gt;Dr. R. Krishna Murthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the amendment to the Workmen&#39;s Compensation Bill, including the wording of the Act and changing the name to Employees Compensation Bill provides for a removal of the ceiling. I saw the Bill, but am yet to see the notification of the Act. The changes do provide for a removal of the ceiling of Rs.4000 which pegged the limit of compensation paid particularly for those drawing more salary. Moreover, in the Act, clerical employees were also not covered. The Amendment provided for the larger coverage.<br />Dr. R. Krishna Murthy<br />Dr. R. Krishna Murthy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vivek Patwardhan		</title>
		<link>https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivek Patwardhan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments Anvesh. But Anvesha got it right I think. The minister is Mallikarjun Kharge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vivek]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Anvesh. But Anvesha got it right I think. The minister is Mallikarjun Kharge.</p>
<p>Vivek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anvesh		</title>
		<link>https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anvesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://vivekvsp.com/2010/04/compensation-a-landmark-judgement/#comment-3898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So true sir. Some of the laws are archaic and surely need to be amended. And I did not remember the name of the law minister but Google tells me it is M Veerappa Moily :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true sir. Some of the laws are archaic and surely need to be amended. And I did not remember the name of the law minister but Google tells me it is M Veerappa Moily 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
